Connecting the Commons to Voluntary Action and Nonprofit Research

October 12, 2018
12:00 noon, UTC -1United States

To attend webinar

Time information:

  • 12:00 noon, UTC -1

  • 8:00 AM presenter local time (Kansas City, MO)

  • 9:00 AM presenter local time (Amherst, MA)

  • 7:00 AM presenter local time (Provo, Utah)

  • 9:00 AM moderator time (Amherst, MA, USA)

  • Use this link to calculate your own local time if needed 

 

To join the webinar by computer:

 

To join the webinar by phone: 

  • US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 876 9923 

  • International numbers available here   

  • Webinar ID:  930 447 321

Scholars have recently recognized shared interests between commons scholars and nonprofit and voluntary action scholars (Brudney and Meijs, 2009; Bushouse, Never, and Christensen, 2016). While both lines of scholarship consider similar topics related to the concept of ‘beyond markets and state’ (E. Ostrom, 2009)- collective action, resource scarcity, governance of nested systems- there has been very little intentional overlap between the two. This paper articulates that both sets of scholars would be better served by integrating the strengths in their intellectual traditions and lays out key elements from nonprofit and voluntary action scholars in particular that could potentially augment the findings in commons scholarship. The intended result is to continue to open the dialogue across two multidisciplinary fields of scholarly endeavor.
Scholars have recently recognized shared interests between commons scholars and nonprofit and voluntary action scholars (Brudney and Meijs, 2009; Bushouse, Never, and Christensen, 2016). While both lines of scholarship consider similar topics related to the concept of ‘beyond markets and state’ (E. Ostrom, 2009)- collective action, resource scarcity, governance of nested systems- there has been very little intentional overlap between the two. This paper articulates that both sets of scholars would be better served by integrating the strengths in their intellectual traditions and lays out key elements from nonprofit and voluntary action scholars in particular that could potentially augment the findings in commons scholarship. The intended result is to continue to open the dialogue across two multidisciplinary fields of scholarly endeavor.